e-Debate: Frank van Eekeren shares his thoughts in Round 3
It is not a taboo. First of all there are many examples of partners openly discussing their programmes, including their challenges and mistakes (although often behind closed doors).
Second: open debate depends on the nature of power relations between the parties involved. If there is a strong dependence on the donor, competition between organisations (for funds), etc. - visibility and a positive image are crucial, and openness about mistakes will not be rewarded.
The key to more openness is to increase the value of and reward for ‘learning’ in the programmes - and not to focus only on accountability.
What three active measures do you recommend the S&D community to take as a collective in the next 3-5 years to address the biggest challenges outlined earlier in the discussion?
- Develop and support strategic partnerships between the various stakeholders (North-South, South-South, North-North) – to influence power relations and to ‘learn’;
- Invest in structural academic research and M&E – to ‘learn’ and (indirectly) influence power relations;
- Invest in partnership and exchange of knowledge with other sectors, such as health care and education – to ‘learn’ and (indirectly) influence power relations.
[This article has been edited by the Operating Team. If you would like to post a comment, please make sure your text is less than 600 characters!]
Activity